"Each intermediary represents a point where transactions become opaque to the ultimate parties and vulnerable to manipulation."— From the analysis of 1MDB's fraudulent bond sales through Goldman Sachs
Traditional Banking
Bitcoin Settlement
No intermediaries
Visible end-to-end
How Intermediaries Enabled 1MDB Fraud
When Malaysia's 1MDB conducted its fraudulent bond sales through Goldman Sachs, the complex intermediary structure helped obscure the fraud. Proceeds flowed through multiple banks and jurisdictions before reaching their illicit destinations—each handoff creating opacity that defeated investigators for years.
"The complex chain of ostensibly independent counterparties defeated investigators for years."
— Wright & Hope, Billion Dollar Whale (2018)With Bitcoin settlement: Every transfer would be visible end-to-end. The $700 million flowing to personal accounts would have been publicly traceable from the moment it left the fund. There would be no opacity points where transactions "become opaque to the ultimate parties and vulnerable to manipulation."
| Metric | Traditional Settlement | Bitcoin Settlement |
|---|---|---|
| Settlement Time | 3-5 business days | ~60 minutes (cryptographic finality) |
| Intermediaries | 4-6 entities (banks, clearing houses) | 0 (peer-to-peer) |
| Fee Structure | 0.05-0.1% + fixed fees per intermediary | ~$1-5 flat (regardless of amount) |
| Visibility | Opaque at each intermediary | Visible end-to-end, permanently recorded |
| Manipulation Risk | Each intermediary is a vulnerability point | No intermediaries to manipulate |
| Track Record | Centuries (with periodic failures) | 15+ years, trillions in cumulative value, 100% uptime |